Spring Morning in Monument

   On a warm, sunny morning in spring, I sat quietly in Memorial Park in Colorado Springs, observing subtle yet unmistakable signs of seasonal transition. Winter’s grip was visibly loosening, revealing vibrant patches of bright green grass spurred on by the rain. Trees around me have begun to bud, delicate green tips breaking through stark winter branches, signaling renewal. Each branch seemed to reach tentatively toward the sunlight, seeking warmth and nourishment after months of dormancy.

    Birds hopping energetically between branches, their songs rich with anticipation of warmer days ahead. Their movements seemed inspired and almost frantic, as though they too were trying to make the most of what is typically a short-lived spring. Occasionally, I spotted robins hopping along the ground, searching for worms in the softening earth. Their focused, deliberate actions look instinctive and hurried, reminding me of the deep-seated rhythms that govern wildlife. 

    Nearby, squirrels darted across the paths and grassy areas, their frenetic energy adding another layer of life to the unfolding scene. Their behavior, playful yet purposeful, mirrored the excitement of the shifting season, a response perhaps driven by instinctual awareness of the resources becoming increasingly available. 

    Occasionally, a cool breeze swept through, providing a poignant reminder of winter's lingering presence, sharply juxtaposed against the warmth of the morning sun. The chill served as a gentle reminder that change is seldom abrupt; it involves moments of tension between what was and what is yet to come. 

    Reflecting on this experience, I was struck by the profound nature of seasonal change—an ongoing process marked by both subtlety and drama, reminding us of life's inherent cycles and resilience. It emphasized the persistence of gradual transformations occurring all around us, often unnoticed until intentionally observed, revealing the complexity and beauty inherent in transitions. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Initial Reflection

     When thinking about my own relationship with the environment, I have a much broader view than most. To me, the environment is everywhere that you are. The environment is a combination of the places and things that make up the world around us. I believe that defining "the environment" as places set aside from human activity opens the door for us to abuse the places and resources closest to home. As someone who likes to think about how their actions affect the environment, I think it is very important to have a very wide definition of the environment. This forces us to treat the places which we might see as mundane or  inconsequential with the same care that we give to the places which are hailed as natural wonders.          As someone who has grown up with a strong interest in outdoor activities, it feels like my care and reverence for the environment was inevitable. When spending extended periods of time in natural areas, ...
Read more

Environmental Justice

     One tension that stood out to me after reading Dorceta  Taylor’s “The Evolution of Environmental Justice” and Kyle  Whyte’s “Indigenous Experience, Environmental Justice and Settler Colonialism” is the distance between an environmental‑justice framework rooted in civil‑rights activism and the distinct demands for justice voiced by Indigenous peoples living under ongoing settler colonialism. Taylor traces how predominantly Black and Latinx communities organized against toxic waste, framing environmental harm as yet another layer of racial oppression. Her genealogy locates injustice in unequal exposure and unequal power, pollution lands where political leverage is weakest.      Whyte, by contrast, argues that for many Indigenous nations the central grievance is not simply disproportional pollution but the persistent erasure of relationships with land that make Indigenous life possible. He calls settler colonialism “ecological domination,” a structure tha...
Read more

Veganism as an Aspiration

     One tension that stood out to me in Lori Gruen and Robert C. Jones’s "Veganism as an Aspiration" is the uneasy relationship between the idea that animals have equal moral worth and the reality that animals themselves often cause harm to one another. Gruen and Jones advocate for veganism not as a rigid rule, but as an aspirational practice — a way of striving to minimize the suffering we cause to other sentient beings. They argue that recognizing animals as moral equals obliges us to change our eating and consumption habits, even if doing so is difficult and imperfect.      However, this idea becomes complicated when we reflect on the fact that nonhuman animals regularly harm and kill each other in nature. If animals, too, are moral equals, does their causing of suffering undermine the claim that we are obligated to avoid causing any suffering? It seems hypocritical to expect humans to uphold an absolute principle of nonviolence when those we are morall...
Read more